On Monday, July 10, 2017, James Mescall secured a settlement of $700,000 on a case filed in Essex County. He represented a 46-year-old woman who had one level cervical fusion surgery more than four years after a motor vehicle accident. She was driving to work on Route 22 in Newark when she attempted to pass a truck, traveling in the middle lane, on the right. The tractor (bob-tail) began to move into the right lane to exit the highway, causing a minor collision. The property damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle was approximately $800. The truck had no damage. The defense retained John Desch, an accident reconstruction expert, who claimed the “Delta V” was less than 5 mph. Defendant’s biomechanical expert, Ronald Fijalkowski, claimed that the cervical herniation could not have been caused by the minor impact. Dr. Albert Thrower opined, for the defense, that plaintiff had a “degenerative disc osteophyte complex” which predated the collision. Plaintiff had not returned to work as longshoreman following the accident. Plaintiff had a significant lost wage claim and there was an ERISA lien. The case was settled with the assistance of Judge Robert Gardner. There were motions pending to strike the opinions of the defendant’s accident reconstruction expert and biomechanical expert based primarily on the faulty methodology employed in calculating the “Delta V”. The case was settled before those motions were decided.
All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) are powerful, fast, open vehicles that enthusiasts find fun and exhilarating. However, without the proper safety and regulatory precautions, drivers, especially those under the age of 16, can be in serious danger. Discover safety guidelines by reading our newsletter.
What responsibilities do companies have towards their employees? Read our newsletter here to find out about what you can do to protect your job, and obtain workers compensation in New Jeresy.
Our clients can now watch our deposition video on our website and on Youtube! If you have an upcoming deposition with us, be sure to watch it here.
The firm procured a $1 million dollar settlement for its client. However, one issue in the case remains to be decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Johnson vs. Roselle EZ Quick, LLC, et. al., Docket #: 07504.
Karon Johnson, who was 20 years old, purchased a bottle of vodka from a liquor store. He drank the liquor and ran his vehicle through a fence and into a tree receiving serious injuries and becoming paralyzed from the waist down. Since he was allowed to purchase alcohol despite being underaged, the firm asserted a claim against the package store. There were no witnesses to the purchase, and Johnson did not have a receipt. Any video of the transaction was recycled prior to the date the firm was retained to represent Johnson. The liquor store denied making the sale. However, the firm’s investigation revealed several people who had purchased liquor, while underage, from the same liquor store. The insurance company for the defendant offered the full liquor liability policy, in the amount of $1,000,000.00 in settlement which Johnson agreed to accept. However, Geico Insurance Company which provided no-fault medical insurance covering the vehicle Johnson was operating at the time of the accident, had paid $250,000.00 of Johnson’s medical bills. Geico asserted a claim to “claw back” the $250,000.00 in medical benefits paid from the settlement proceeds, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1. The disputed funds were placed in escrow pending the Court’s determination of the issue.
After Johnson’s accident the New Jersey Legislature amended the law to prevent a no-fault insurer from “clawing back” no-fault benefits where an injured person was not “fully compensated” by the available liability insurance proceeds. The Legislature did not explicitly indicate whether the statutory amendment applied to cases which were pending or only to “new” accidents which occurred after the date the amendment was passed into law. After obtaining transcripts of the legislative hearings Mescall & Acosta argued that the Legislature intended the amendment to be “retroactive” and apply to cases which were pending, such as Johnson’s, at the time the amendment became law. The case has proceed through both the Law Division and the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court. Mescall & Acosta and counsel for Geico have both filed their briefs with the New Jersey Supreme Court. It is expected that the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the Spring of 2015 and decide the case. If Mescall & Acosta prevail, Mr. Johnson will receive his entire settlement which will be placed into a “Special Needs Trust” to assist in paying for the ongoing care which his medical condition requires.
The Verdicts and Settlements page has been updated! Take a few minutes to read about the successful results Mescall & Acosta has achieved on behalf of their clients.
Mescall & Acosta is proud to launch their new website which give you the ability to learn more about the law practice and how they can help their clients.